As talked about in previous reports, a few instances was indeed filed against Jackson Hewitt and H&R Block for breach of state Credit Services Organization Act regulations. 205 These rules control both credit fix businesses and person that is“any organization whom assists or proposes to help customers in acquiring an expansion of credit, ”206 which will add income tax preparers whom provide to set up RALs. Three of those situations include:
- Thomas v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc. , 950 N.E. 2d 578 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011) (affirming dismissal predicated on failure to sufficiently allege damages from Hewitt’s breach of state credit solutions company work).
- Fugate v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc. , 347 S.W. 3d 81 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011) (reversing dismissal, income tax preparer might be credit solutions company and even though customer failed to make repayment straight to preparer).
- Gomez v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc. , 16 A. 3d 261 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2011) (income tax preparer that facilitated RALs wasn’t a credit solution company because client paid preparer for RAL facilitation just indirectly; court relied, ironically, in part in the proven fact that Maryland particularly passed a legislation regulating RAL facilitators). Continue reading “Credit Services Organization Situations”